Category: <span>OPINION</span>

🔍 Not long ago, I spoke here about the danger of autophagy, that moment when artificial intelligence begins to feed on its own output, endlessly recycling the same ideas and impoverishing the diversity of knowledge.

👉 Cognitive autophagy, when humans feed on impoverished content! : https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/cognitive-autophagy-when-humans-feed-impoverished-content-buschini-d1oje

and

👉 Autophagy, when AI feeds on itself : https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/ai-autophagy-when-feeds-itself-philippe-buschini-sydee

But there’s another, more intimate risk: the risk of losing even the desire to think.

Imagine a knowledge architect. Every day, they sketch, question, connect ideas. Then one day, a machine offers them the blueprints. Clear, fast, seductive. So they tweak them. They approve. But they no longer question.

AI is not attacking us. It’s helping. And that’s precisely where the shift happens. It spares us the effort — and that effort may be all we have left to remain truly human.

🧠 What if the real danger doesn’t lie in the tool… but in the combination of two phenomena?

– An AI looping endlessly on itself.
– Humans who no longer wish to produce anything different.

OPINION

What if our healthcare system wasn’t failing from lack of resources—but from a lack of connection?

Picture this: an on-call doctor tries to retrieve the medical history of an unconscious patient. The information exists, somewhere. A clinic. A GP’s notes. A specialist’s report. But nothing flows. No system talks to another.

That’s the true cost of missing interoperability.

It may sound technical, but it’s actually one of the most powerful levers for transforming healthcare. At the crossroads of medical ethics, digital sovereignty, and human-centered innovation.

In this article, I explore why making health data circulate securely and meaningfully is not a futuristic luxury, but a critical foundation. And more importantly, how we can start doing things differently, as caregivers, patients, institutions, and technologists.

OPINION

What if we’re becoming the zombies of a corrupted knowledge?

Every day, without even realizing it, we scroll, click, like… feeding our minds a lukewarm stew of recycled information, mass-produced and stripped of its substance.

It’s no longer just AI looping endlessly through its own soup of synthetic content — it’s us. Our brains, once curious, agile, and eager for complexity, now settle for digital crumbs pre-chewed by machines.

The result?

A thought process that’s impoverished and standardized, slowly losing its ability to tell truth from falsehood, depth from superficiality.

OPINION

🚨 72% of our cloud is under American control! 🚨

With Trump’s return and his “America First” doctrine, our technological dependence is no longer just a commercial disadvantage – it’s a STRATEGIC TRAP closing in on us.

In this (very) long article, I share with you:

✅ How we have systematically CONFUSED infrastructure with software in our cloud strategies
✅ Why our French champions tear each other apart while the tech giants present a united front
✅ How our bureaucracy has SACRIFICED our most promising technological gems
✅ My proposal for a “DIGITAL EURO FOR CLOUD” with a precise 2025-2035 timeline

When Broadcom increased VMware prices by 300% (even 1050% for some), it’s not just a CIO problem, it’s OUR MONEY filling the gap while our public services operate on tight budgets.

The urgency to act has NEVER been more palpable.

OPINION

While ChatGPT composes our emails, Midjourney illustrates our presentations, and other AIs code on our behalf, we find ourselves facing a fascinating paradox: never have we had such powerful tools to amplify our creativity, and yet, never have we seemed so vulnerable to the consequences of this amplification.

In my article “Ethical challenges and future perspectives of generative AI,” I explore this gray area where neither blissful techno-optimism nor paralyzing catastrophism is sufficient to grasp the reality.

OPINION