Tag: <span>BIAISES</span>

_What if you could whisper into an AI’s ear, without anyone noticing?_

Some researchers did exactly that. Not in a novel, but on arXiv, one of the most respected scientific platforms. By inserting invisible messages into their papers, they discreetly influenced the judgment—not of human readers, but of the AI systems reviewing the submissions.

White text on a white background. Microscopic font size. Hidden instructions.
The reader sees nothing. The AI, however, obeys.

This isn’t just a clever technical trick. It’s a sign of the times.

Because in a world where AIs help us read, choose, and decide—what happens when the AI itself is being manipulated, without our knowledge?
And even more unsettling: what’s left of our free will, if even the information we read has already been preformatted… for the machine that filters our perception?

👉 This article explores a new kind of manipulation. Subtle. Sneaky. Invisible. Yet remarkably effective.

OPINION

💡 What if AI biases were nothing more than our own… amplified?

Algorithms have no morals or intentions. But they learn from us. From our data. From our past decisions. And sometimes—without us even realizing it—they inherit our deepest prejudices.

In this excerpt, I invite you to dive into a cartography of our digital missteps: a journey through the invisible biases that quietly shape machine decisions… and already influence our lives. Hiring, credit, justice, healthcare—no sector is spared.

🔍 Whether it’s historical bias, representation gaps, or blind trust in automation, each algorithmic distortion acts like a funhouse mirror reflecting our society. This isn’t just a technical issue—it’s a matter of conscience.

And maybe, to build fairer AI, we first need to take a better look at ourselves.

CERISE & ADA

In a world where our smartphones understand us better than our loved ones, where our virtual assistants listen without ever yawning from boredom, a new form of escape has been born.

When applications promise us “a girlfriend who understands you perfectly, without the complications of real life” for $200 per month, isn’t it time to question what we’re really trying to escape from?

From digital infidelity to virtual hugs, let’s explore together this troubling frontier where our creations become our favorite creatures… and where we risk becoming machines ourselves through interacting with them.

OPINION COLUMN

Since the dawn of humanity, we have pursued the Promethean dream of creating in our own image. From Vaucanson’s automatons to Pascal’s mechanical calculators, this quest has shaped our civilization. But never, until now, had the boundary between human creation and artificial generation been so delicately blurred.

ChatGPT, Claude, Midjourney, DeepSeek, Perplexity have become the new deities of a technological pantheon where creation seems liberated from human expertise. Text, image, melody: everything now merely awaits our desire, materialized in a few clicks, to transform us into artists with a simple snap of the fingers, without the shadow of a transaction.

OPINION

We oscillate between fascination and distrust when it comes to AI. On one side, the enthusiasts who see it as an inevitable revolution. On the other, the skeptics who remind us that “AI won’t bake the bread.”

But are we asking the right question? 🤔
In creating artificial intelligence, what are we truly searching for? A tool to surpass ourselves… or a mirror reflecting our own limitations?

When children prefer to ask AI for help rather than their peers because “it won’t mock them,” it makes us think.
What if, paradoxically, AI is revealing what we have lost in our own humanity?

Artificial Intelligence or Augmented Intelligence: What future do we really want?

OPINION COLUMN