Philippe Buschini Posts

“This AI writes better than I do!”

I hear this sentence at least three times a week. From a marketing director dazzled by ChatGPT. From a graphic designer fascinated by Midjourney. From a student who just discovered that a machine can solve their math exercises in seconds.

And every time, I think to myself: we’ve just crossed an invisible line.

Not the line of technical performance, that’s just computing doing what it’s always done: calculating fast and well. No, we’ve crossed the line of our own devaluation. The one where we start doubting our most human capabilities: thinking, creating, deciding.

As a mathematician who works with AI daily, I see three grand mythological narratives being constructed before our eyes. Three seductive stories that gradually make us abandon something precious: our intellectual autonomy.

The problem isn’t that AI is too performant. It’s that we’re becoming too gullible.

In the lines that follow, I invite you to dissect these three myths with me, myths that are silently redrawing the boundaries of our humanity. Because before knowing what AI can do, it’s about time we remember what we don’t want to lose.

Ready for a little collective exercise in lucidity?

OPINION

📌 Friday mood post 📌

🧙‍♂️ Alchemists spent their lives trying to turn lead into gold.
💼 Modern consultants have no such obsession — they turn gold into procedure… and bill you for the VAT on top.

Take a bright idea, a real spark of inspiration.
Drop it into an Excel spreadsheet, sprinkle some lukewarm jargon, toss in three vague KPIs and a “deliverable” for good measure…
🎯 Congrats, you’ve just created a SMART goal: Specific, Measurable, Achievable, Realistic, Time-bound.
✨ A brilliant acronym to standardize genius and organize boredom.

By trying to frame, model, and rationalize everything, we’ve pulled off something quite spectacular: we’ve neutralized creative thinking — without even needing censorship.
All it takes is a process, an evaluation grid, and a good old “kick-off meeting”.

And what if the real, honest, street-level definition of SMART was actually something like this:

– Simplify the complex
– Make meetings meaningful (or at least long)
– Annihilate all originality
– Reduce ambition
– Turn drive into reporting

😂

In this little mood piece, I explore, with a wry smile and a touch of arsenic, how our obsession with deliverables slowly strangles the unexpected, the absurd, and sometimes even… genius itself.

📌 Spoiler: These days, Newton would’ve had to open a Jira ticket for his apple.
And he’d get a Slack reminder to “think inside the box.”

OPINION COLUMN

💥 What if the real revolution wasn’t about machines, but about how we see work itself?

Every era has its fears. Yesterday, it was the weaving loom. Today, it’s artificial intelligence. With each breakthrough comes the same old story: we fear extinction, and forget transformation.

And yet…

📜 History whispers something different. It tells how, behind every seeming disappearance, there was a metamorphosis. How jobs evolved. How human talent shifted, toward places no machine could ever reach.

I invite you on a journey through time and imagination. A story told by two voices: Ada (the AI) and Cerise (17 years old), to rethink what it means to work, adapt, and create in a world in motion.

If you believe AI kills jobs, read this.

And if you don’t… read it anyway.

CERISE & ADA

📌 Friday mood post 📌

🦵💸 €350 for half a pant leg and a full-blown loss of meaning? Yes, it’s real. And no, it’s not a joke.

There was a time when fashion aimed to elevate the body. Today, it’s content to chop off a leg—in the name of creative boldness. At that price, you’re not buying trousers, you’re buying a stance. Half a pair of jeans, a whole marketing strategy. And it works. Sold out.

Genius, really: invent nothing, sell it at a premium, and convince people it’s profound. Welcome to the age of proudly worn absurdity, 2025 edition.

What’s next? You’ll laugh. Or cry. Or click add to cart.

OPINION COLUMN

💬 It speaks well. It answers fast. It impresses… But it does not think.

Artificial intelligence is not what you believe it is. Not thinking, just predicting. Not a mind, but a statistical echo. And maybe the real danger isn’t AI itself, but what we stop doing because it exists.

🧠 AI doesn’t steal our intelligence. It simply relieves us from using it. And in that relief, a slow erosion begins… one that eats away at our ability to question, to seek, to truly think.

This article is not a manifesto against technology. It’s a plea for thought. An invitation to lucidity. And a warning about what we might lose, without even noticing: our inner freedom.

📖 Read it. Share it. Start a conversation. This isn’t just a text about AI.
It’s a text about you.

OPINION